Oh! Now Nazis Suddenly Matter Again?! What the...

NOTE: 24-Jan-2022 was mentioned as the launch of Russia's SMO. This has been corrected to 24-Feb-2022. Not sure where wires crossed... sorry.

I really don't get you people; please help me understand, 'cause what I'm seeing is more evidence of folks lacking in good reason, always obsessed with surface forms, and, so, always willing to vilify first and, eventually, maybe, examine things once proven wrong, which is also called being somewhat demented and calling that normal, which is pretty much what's to be seen from some groups these days, and it ain't pretty.

This story, or, rather, its implications and the significance of such, is one that speaks volumes to me, the parallels between it and current barriers that I see as important hindrances to a better world being one I may briefly forward in a separate post, as it's a topic I've to be in the right mood for should I wish to avoid penning what's sure to be taken as a targeted anti-world F-U albeit it not being so.

And it's not the ones who cheered on the Nazi invited into Canadian Parliament that's my bigger concern—though they're not without having earned some of that concern—it's all the ones who are shouting down the act but who've continually backed support to Ukraine, always calling for more weapons to be sent, for those evil, globally-destructive monsters known as Russians have to be stopped at all costs.

For formality's sake, as I assume all now know the details: The Nazi referred to is the 98-year-old Yaroslav Hunka, who had been a guest to the Canadian House of Commons on Friday, in honour of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky's visit to Canada.

Hunka was called “a Ukrainian hero, a Canadian hero” and was honoured for his WWII service fighting for Ukraine's freedom as well as for his sacrifice in fighting “for Ukrainian independence against the Russians.” He received a standing ovation.

Hunka, it appears, was one among some of the worst bastards to be seen during WWII and for some time afterwards, being, in part, a member of the 14th Waffen Grenadier division of the SS; countless war crimes and vicious massacres were conducted by this unit during the second half of World War II. His participation in acts of savagery done under the banner of sovereignty and freedom didn't end with the the defeat of Nazi Germany, however, as Hunka, being a Banderite, added 'pogrom participation' to his list of hate-driven and genocidal activities, which includes torture as well as ethnic, religious, and socially-motivated killings through to many indiscriminate ones, too, their victims among Poles, Ukrainians, Jews, and Russians. Some of it too savage for words.

In short, albeit being 98, he is the embodiment of all that has been placed under the "Nazi" label that I and others have been trying to draw proper attention to in order to get the Western world, fooled into offering consent, to see what lies at the heart of the conflict in Ukraine, and the type of mentality that has allowed its historically-based-but-now- unreasoned hatred to turn them into a tool for the West's globalization efforts, achieved under US hegemony. Hence why, no matter the denial offered, "proxy war" is the only label I've seen fit to identify the entire situation centred around Ukraine, all of it far too easy to avoid so that, from the West and Kyiv regime, 'wanting it' and 'making it happen' are inseparable from any explanation that's to be seen as a valid one; anything else assumes we're total morons if not too filled with hate to see anything clearly.

But here's the thing, and why any of the Western governments could have—and some did—easily wound up facing a similar situation: Associating the Banderites with the Nazis is very logical, but it's wholly inaccurate to do so.

This all too common false parallel, which I've also been guilty of, has added a vexing layer to the problem whilst, by virtue of being a mischaracterisation, it's provided ample points of disparity that could be wrangled into one-line retorts meant to be inarguable disses and owns that established one's baseness and why talk of Nazis was a sure sign that one was dealing with a Putin Punter with brain-impeding Alex-Jonesing tendencies.

Looking at the details isn't necessary if "deny" is all that's needed—while pointing at big-bold headlines; why would corporate media lie?—and, so, a complex position that can be assigned and limited to the other tribe is brashly given the "crackpot" stamp and gets discarded, thus reinforcing the destructive lies with hardly an effort, just a lazy denial? Flip side, however, wants a scandalous they assume will instantly establish the opposing tribe's evil and wrongful views of things, thus reinforcing the easy disregard of destructive lies.

What's really at play here provides a clear sign of the conflict's muddled interpretation versus its actual import and that of the global shift underway that's sparked the large-scale clash which some, very foolishly, still believe to be no more than a regional territorial battle triggered by the whims of an imperial czar-wannabe who'll surely be driven to keep going west until stopped by an ocean, or an army. So better nip the loony in the bud and send Kyiv bigger weapons. Then send some more.

I'm quite certain that the Canadian government doesn't have a closeted Nazi fetish, nor is it funding a Nazi revivement effort or working on transforming Trudeau into the Red Skull (we have J. Peterson for that, do recall).

Notice that the apologies that were offered in response to the swell of public incense that's been expressed... which came only after a few had explained to many what was so wrong about that picture, which they repeated, but, this time, confirmation came from mainstream media... enter that swell of indignation... and, now, please notice that the apologies were restricted to the "Nazi" part, and WWII, too.

Placing emphasis on "Nazis" is appropriate for the many that were attracted to the side of Ukraine that had turned into a well-funded ethno-nationalist retreat and work camp; canoe and sports in the morning, gutting pro-Russians in the afternoon, Dismembering 201 certificate learning at night. However, it is insulting, I'm certain, for those who identify as Banderites, for it betrays a clear misunderstanding of their fight and ideals. I touch on this here.

Frankly, I find the whole thing hilarious; far from the only faux-pas in this shameful dance with a forbidden partner that's occurred since 24-Feb-2022, but Canada outdid the others, on this I agree: Ouch! That was embarrassing, to say the least.

But it doesn't establish Canada as a supporter and facilitator of Nazis.

What it does signify is how far too many Canadians have been little more than blind supporters of Kyiv's stupidity, and how far too many have played a duplicitous role in sending duped Ukrainians to their deaths.

What it does scream is how ignorant, fear-fueled hate-lovers and their moronic modes of supremacist thinking still vie for dominance but fail to seize how irrelevant they've become.

What it does holler is just how prized certain forms of xenophobia are if it hampers a designated Western foe.

The over-emphasis placed on "nazi-collaborator" that's witnessed across many articles appears to be no more than one's limited interpretation, satisfied with imposed parallels and surface forms, once more. If A then A.

Or, perhaps, it's one's attempt to draw attention and disdain toward an issue in a way that only "Nazi" manages to do. 

The collaboration between Ukraine's OUN forces and the Nazis didn't last long, the Nazis having turned on those Ukrainians that were collaborators once they'd understood that the OUN were fighting for a liberated, non-Nazi Ukraine, and, as such, they couldn't be true to the German's cause; they saw in the Nazis the same thing that the Nazis saw in the OUN: a mutually beneficial tool to an end.

The Ukrainian mentality that's been adopted by a segment that's conveniently referred to as Banderites is "special" in its own violently-nationalistic ways and deserves to be understood as the separate entity and beast that it is rather than being reduced to a small overlap in a story that began in 1920 and, clearly, still goes strong. Protestants aren't Mormons and KKK and neo-Nazis aren't synonyms.

I fail to see a marked resemblance between Banderites and Nazi ideology other than through the clear, targeted hatred that's central to the 'politics' and ideals held by each. The acquisition and retention of certain symbols can be explained simply as adoption and influence, the OUN containing many who'd had a direct contact with Nazis whilst still believing that spilling blood for Hitler would finally earn them their sovereignty.

Silly Ukrainians. That'll teach them to ever trust another Nazi!

The bits of OUN—and subsequent forms—manifestos that I've read shed an important light on Zeeskyy and the Non-Z's willingness to sacrifice countless legs, leaving no one standing. Frankly, I'd fear the Banderites more, for they are the unruly guerilla army to the Nazi's regimented struture and order. A deadly flea against a lion's roar.

The right spray, though, and one's flea problems are resolved much faster. Nazis, on the other hand... how many times have I mentioned seeing Nazis pop out of every global nook and cranny in the past couple of years? More than what's normal, that's for sure.      

The Banderite and Nazi thing turns into chaos once "neo" gets tossed in there, I know, for it does add much ambivalence and it does create much ambiguity, but ambihate isn't a thing, I checked.

Real hate is, though, still today, that's a thing.

Becoming trendy, even. And attracting a hatred that fit some general framework guaranteed having more haters willing to fire guns, hopefully at Russians, so, really, who could afford to be quality-conscious with hate that's miles away on another continent when the Russians are right there, being their usual blame magnets.

Smart investment. You'd see that, if you weren't so filled with rage, fighting for peace.     

•     •     •

The Russian ministry's official response included: "The incident characterizes the unbridled Russophobia embraced by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government."

I can't quite agree with that. It's more along the lines of being an "absorbed reflex" than anything "unbridled", in my opinion. An involuntary and ignorant "oh, those naughty Russians" is closer to what lies behind 'Canadian' sentiments rather than anything resembling "Russians?! Kill them all!"

With the US as our friend and neighbour, we gotta hate the Russians, we just gotta, OK? Sorry, Russia, you know how it is.

•     •     •

I do believe that PM Justin Trudeau was unaware, and I also buy that the former House Speaker, Anthony Rota, was equally unaware of that past despite being the one who had invited Hunka.

However, I do agree with those who've stated that "[i]t seems highly unlikely, however, that the Canadian government would allow anyone into parliament without thorough pre-emptive screening when Zelensky, a visiting president, was speaking.".

For that, my suspicion lies with deputy PM Chrystia Freeland, whose maternal Ukrainian half can be traced to elbows that were rubbed with those of Banderites, and, by the transitive property, and all that...

While she is a very good and efficient minister, she's got a clear conflict of interest with Ukraine that's brought out her senselessly hawkish nature while it accentuated a viciously-eager à la neolib cost-cutting view of liberation she'd love to slap up and down Russia once Canada's restoration contracts are set with Kyiv's new government, Blackrock. In other words: She's a bit of hardline kook that's doing harm to Canada and lying to Canadians, in my opinion.

•     •     •

I'm wholy against sending more weapons to Ukraine. Had Kyiv never been given weapons and taunted with NATO membership it was never to have in the first place, I'm willing to bet Ukraine would still be Ukraine. That Ukraine is gone.

I fully disagree with the narrative we are expected to believe; this "nazi" thing kinda helped awaken a few out of it, it seems, and that's a good thing. Involving a Nazi. See. Don't judge.

I'm fully opposed to the Trudeau government's interpretation and handling of, as well as for our participation in, the Ukraine situation and what has devolved into the present conflict.

My nationality has not affected my reasoning or honesty, and there's far too much coming from the West in relations to Ukraine that, one is bound to realise, relies on pure hatred and zero good sense to justify what amounts to power-lust and pillaging, two things the West, sadly, excels in. 

And, no, I'm not possessed by Rasputin's spirit and I don't have some bizarre raging Russia fixation, obsessive Putin passion, and I've not been brainwashed into hating the West by having unconsciously absorbed one Russian fake ad too many on social media. 

One thing that may be different between you and I is that I've put in the effort and shed all the stereotypes that have been forced on us through tropes and manipulations of all sorts, prying off years and years of lies, breaking free of the indoctrination that shaped Western minds, instilling a reflexive fear of all those whose economies couldn't be so easily swallowed up and controlled by Washington through a peaceful normalization in spite of their God given freedom to do so, for the good of the world.

It sucks for the West, perhaps, but I don't care: I don't fear Russians nor do I believe that "barbaric subhumans" or variants of such is applicable, and it's certainly not appropriate.

Haven't fainted? Still reading? Brace yourself: I also think that Putin is on the side of 'right' in this fight, as well as the larger one that ties the West to a "territorial squabble" as they push it toward a full-scale global war.

I do see justification in launching the SMO, knowing full well that Ukrainian forces were piled at the separation line threatening to plough through the Luhansk and Donetsk whilst also having intensified their shelling, sharply increasing attacks on the ethno-Russians, who fired back, but clearly weren't the instigators in the weeks preceding 24-Feb-2022. This, do recall, was amid a warning from Biden that the Russians had spent lavishly and gone all out to produce a high-quality film that—although no one had seen it or could prove its existence—depicted a hyper-realistically-savage attack on ethnic-Russians by the Ukrainians. That sick, twisted Putin, right? 

Well, if such a thing materialises, it's fake! All fake. Russia bad, Putin evil, OK?     

Basics missed by corruption-overlooking, pro-imperialist Bidenites:

• The imperialist/recreate Soviet Union angle is a blatant lie created by the West.
• For eight years Putin refused to annex the two Donbas regions, pushing for them to be considered autonomous zones despite the governors' pleas to be annexed, and in spite of the pressure Moscow's ruling class were putting on Putin (who's far more moderate than he's been made out ot be).
• The West, along with some Ukraine oligarchs who benefitted from pushing things the US' way, invested much money and pumped much hate in Ukraine's extremist elements, using these to irritate Moscow through violence targeting—though not limited to—ethnic-Russians.
• The West was behind the snipers that appeared at Euromaidan and the initial acts of extreme violence came from "protesters", not the police; the government 'overreacted', the special police it unleashed cracking down real hard, and with extreme violence, but it was only by putting a careful focus on the elicited violence caused by governmental forces that the "protesters" galvanized the population and rallied a wider support that simply was not present beforehand. No matter how full the Euromaidan square may have seemed, the desires voiced by those willing to protest what was, in actuality, propaganda, represented only a fragment of a section of a percentage of the population.
• Putin tried to strike peace through several avenues; the West has not. It blocked peace, each time. 
• If "full-scale invasion" had really been the plan, Putin wouldn't have sent so few men charging straight ahead for Kyiv. What happened is clear: He sent in the troops hoping it would snap some sense into Zeeskyy and bring him to the negotiating table. Moscow hadn't expected that, and got caught with their pants down in a manner that was easily turned into far more than the temporary incompetence shown that it was, an aspect that the West has constantly milked while not mentioning why Kyiv is continually running out of men and weapons... 

There are more, some with mentions of Nazis and atrocities, but because hating the Russians is what's natural, normal, it makes thinking optional whenever they're involved—ditto the Chinese—and it makes those who think deserving of derision, for the peace-lovers of today all agree: Nazis can be good and harmony on earth will be attained once every Russian head is on a pike!

Peace. It's a bloody business, but well-worth killing for.

•     •     •

Keeping in mind that Banderites and Nazis are two different breeds but that not all hate is hateful if what's hated offers overlap, and while it's true that hate on hate love produces cute babies, all those dedicated haters that had gathered in Ukraine and lumped under the neo-Nazi label were a real concern, until they no longer were, except to Putin Lovers, of course, who craved a strong, muscular dictator but whimpered upon setting their gaze on real, almost-American heroes just because some sun and squiggly lines remind a few conspiracist mama's boys of some symbols they saw on the history channel.

These people, Russian sympathisers, they deserve to have their toenails ripped off, and to be stoned, drawn, and quartered, but none of those always in that order. Gotta keep your victims on their toes. That's an ol' Nazi trick we Canad—oops! Almost spilled the beans there, didn't I?

Returning to earlier bits, up there, there are two key things to retain from this:

1. In any situation, people will clap if the majority claps, and people will ovate by standing up if that's what appears to be the overwhelmingly 'normal' thing to do. In fact, with no reason for it at all, most people will join right in, standing and cheering, if that's what enough people are doing, drawing the rest in, eventually asking in a hushed voice, "Do you know what we're cheering for?"

I used to go to more concerts per year than most probably do in their lifetime, and it really peeved me just how cheap and careless people had become, so easily dispensing their standing ovations like that. Mine has to be earned, and I've accepted the glaring looks and judgments each time I refused to stand up and clapped with only mild enthusiasm.

Cheering whores! That's the real problem with Canada and the world.

That said, I'm almost certain that no one there had taken the time to put two and two to arrive at three, while a Ukrainian fighting Russia does not a link with Nazi make.

So, the first is one all should pay careful attention to: Too many are cheering for a fucking war and to support a side when, in reality, they are utterly clueless, clearly letting brainwashing and the hatred it's generated do their thinking and talking for them.

2. Fighting Russia does not necessarily establish one a Nazi, that's a false equivalency, is what I do believe, and pushing it, albeit providing a great entry point to highlight the type of extremism at hand, introduces other difficulties that compound issues unless properly presented.    

There's a clear division between the Nazi juxtaposition and the Banderite reality from the perspective of the pro-Ukrainian/Putin-evil camp. On the other hand, there's an overextension of the Nazi significance that minimizes the concerns presented by the Banderitic's own and extremely violent view of the world and history.

I fully understand the desire to use that "Nazi" label, but it's also been easily refuted for a reason, making it harder to discuss core issues and not waste time and effort trying to draw futile parallels between very different ideologies. Under such a framework, those who do want to negate such claims will find material to do so since, after all, something can't be what, in fact, it isn't, except through surface forms.

•     •     •

During the standing ovation, take a careful look at Zeeskyy's face, Freeland's, too. I got the sense that Zeeskyy was expecting him, while Freeland's face glowed, and I couldn't help but be disturbed by that uncontrolled smile and the pride that she radiated.

For Zeeskyy and the Nazi-collaborating Banderite, this was the old torch saluting the current flame.

Yes, people. Now are you staring to get what was meant by "Nazis", even if inaccurately so?

•     •     •

That Canada played a key training role through NATO is something I've openly scorned, as it showcases direct involvement with many who may be mislabeled as Nazis, but who sure as hell qualify as far-right extremists one should be equally wary of.

Keep in mind that being USA's neighbour, like being a NATO member, or a member of some other military-minded, US-led club, forces obligations lest one is fond of sanctions?

I've no doubt there's some of that, but it's also been revealed that the government tried to put a lid on as much of our involvement as it could, which betrays a clear presence of guilt if not an acute awareness of wrongdoing.

However, even more overlooked is Ihor Kolomoyskyi role in assembling and funding several ethno-nationalist groups whilst simultaneously backing Zeeskyy's bid for Presidency, a role which some have put forth was little more than a means to condition the nation for an election to come. I'm not sure I'd go so far, but it's not as farfetched a theory as some may assume it to be.

And there's something real odd about the the turn Kolomoyskyi's story took, Washington seizing properties he had in the US as well as bank accounts, suddenly turning on the man and brandishing him a wanted felon, claiming he'd defrauded Ukraine through his bank, all the money siphoned out of the country... but there's much there that doesn't sit well with me, especially with Joe Biden's over-involvement in Kyiv and the clear lies about not knowing what his son was up to. Meanwhile, anti-corruption prosecutors and special consultants are hired and fired and filing cross-complaints as accusations are flying both ways...

Only one version was allowed and accessible to the West. And it's not the one that matches up facts or that assumes that I'm a total idiot who hates Trump too much to apply sound logic.

The one that's been slowly emerging, day by day, despite any efforts to stifle a very shameful and despicable truth, if you think the Canadian government is foolish for cheering on that Nazi, you won't like what I think of those who've very stupidly supported the Kyiv regime, and blindly hate Russians just because you were told to do so.

All the while being no better than Canadian politicians, applauding a Banderite, who was also a Nazi for a wee bit.

No, it's "Boneface". No "R" in There Anywhere 

The tales that Boneface tells is the stuff of nightmares, these confirming some of the sordid stories that initially made the rounds not long after Russia's SMO entered Ukraine, the kind of stories that feature crucified folks, right-side up and upside down, but, any which way, screaming in agony after having been lit on fire. Another had Russians trying to flee after having their achilles sliced through; Banderites laughed, shot at them to stretch their fun.

I've seen and read and heard stuff that truly gets me down after a while, which is when I retreat into coding for a while; two videos are etched in my mind, the screech of a dying man's desperate fear-filled plea and last gasp while an unimaginably cruel act is performed on him... no curiosity is worth that memory.

Excerpt: Juan Sinmiedo, who runs a popular Telegram channel documenting human rights abuses in Ukraine, published an explosive interview with ‘Boneface’ – real name Kent McLellan – a 32-year-old Neo-Nazi from Florida who joined the fascist volunteer Right Sector group during the Donbass war, and returned to fight alongside the Azov Battalion in January 2022.(Source)

The discussion with McLellan shatters many myths and lies that have been circulated about the Maidan coup, the current conflict in Ukraine, and the disturbingly strong influence of nationalist movements within the country.

McLellan, the son of the front man of Neo-Nazi rock band Brutal Attack, got involved with far-right activism while just a teenager, and had numerous run-ins with the law for subversive, racially-charged activities. He and other members of the racist organization American Front were detained by the FBI in May 2012, for preparing terrorist acts against ethnic minorities in Florida.

It was this background that led him to travel to Ukraine in 2014. The American fascist circles he moved in had direct links and regular contact with nationalist groups at the forefront of the Maidan, which at the time were hosting large public events “nearly daily in every Oblast that wasn't seeing war.” As did far-right movements in many other nearby countries, including Finland, Georgia, and Latvia.

You can read the rest here. Yes, it's RT, but, no, the article checks out, and on these particular matters, as it's beneficial for them do to so, you can trust that RT is more accurate than the Western liberal press. 

The Tornado...  Quite the Whirlwind 

Remember when, all of a sudden, stories branding Russian soldiers as child molesters and baby rapists were plastered all over, cranking up that senseless hate just a bit more, and eliciting slightly higher chants to kill all Russians was all in a normal day?

Well, it appears that Kyiv started those rumours in order to conceal any rapes and barbarity perpetrated by Ukrainian soldiers, should any be reported. Why, because they had just released one of the many militias competing for the world's "Worst Psycho Sickos" title, the contenders making the Azov boys look rather tame.

Keep in mind that the Ukrainians were themselves sickened by the deeds committed by members of the Tornado squad and thought it best to lock them up for some time, though giving them fairly light sentences compared to what they'd get in most Western countries, sentences that none completed, being given a release and free pas to the front, but only after arming them first.

Turns out the Wagner group had pulled prisoners out to fight in that interminable 'meat grinder' fight, but Prigozhin had done so without Moscow's consent, among other things.

However, when accusations of using prisoners were at their peak, that coincided with Zeeskyy direct involvement in releasing the kind of people that are best left out of any civil society, war time or not. 

Excerpt: People's deputy of the 8th convocation Ihor Mosiychuk reported that the former commander of the disbanded militia company "Tornado" Ruslan Onishchenko was released from prison after 7 years of imprisonment. He wrote about this in his Telegram channel on Monday, July 11.

In April 2017, the former commander of "Tornado" was sentenced by the Obolon District Court of Kyiv to 11 years of imprisonment on charges of resisting a law enforcement officer, usurping authority, leading to suicide, unnatural rape, kidnapping, illegal deprivation of liberty, and torture. Together with him, seven more of his comrades were sentenced to actual prison terms, five soldiers of the battalion received suspended sentences. In 2019, the Kyiv Court of Appeals left the verdict unchanged. The Supreme Court of Ukraine made a similar decision in September 2021.

In 2015, the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine reported that Onishchenko had been convicted five times. According to the agency's version, the ex-commander of "Tornado" is involved in the creation of a criminal group in the town of Pryvillya, Luhansk region, which engaged in torture and illegal deprivation of liberty of local residents.

You can read the rest here. Fuller, more disturbing accounts of their acts can be found on Ukrainian or Russian sites, which links on those pages reveal, though I leave that up to you.

There are more details than I care to include beyond re-affirming a claim I've already made, convinced that what I'm saying is entirely true: I've seen far more clear evidence of primitive acts of savagery that implicated Ukrainian and pro-Ukrainian fighters than those that showcased Russians doing the crimes, for which we're only ever offered hearsay and the instant, grossly-bigoted accusations dispense by Kyiv.

My Personal Feelings on the Matter

Which reminds me: Oh, boy is it getting hard to listen to that Zeeskyy. Blaming climate change and Bob's diapers on the Russians, forfuksake! I can't listen to him anymore. He's a small, shitty little man.

New Ambassador... Seems Like a Bit of a Biased Liar 

Natalka Cmoc, Canada's new ambassador to Ukraine has, since 15-Aug-2023, merely found herself forced to continue greasing the way for Western wants, which implies putting on a brave smile and not only forcing herself to believe the lies, but encouraging others to do so as well. So, please, semd more weapons.

Here are a few highlights from a CBC article on the topic that were of interest:

Cmoc's assignment is two-pronged, with a short-term focus on supporting Ukraine's immediate defence and security needs while countering all forms of Russian aggression. That often takes the form of meeting with her peers from G7 countries in Kyiv.

Western allies say Ukraine is making progress in its counteroffensive, which Cmoc said is replicating a NATO military tactic to limit the loss of life. "They pull back when they need to, in contrast to Russia, which is like a meat-grinder approach to some of the fighting," she said. [This is something that Kyiv has been continually accused of doing by those quickly stamped as being pro-russian; this claim made about the Russians isn't readily substantiated.]

Cmoc said she hopes to have a full team of 22 diplomats in place by October.

Their duties will range from assessing mine-removal projects to funding programs that can help women take up roles in politics and business that have been vacated by men sent to the front lines.

Her staff will also be supporting ongoing efforts by Canada's atomic safety experts to help their Ukrainian colleagues keep the war from causing ecological and nuclear catastrophe at energy plants.

Lastly

The House of Commons may have applauded a Nazi, but what to make of the National Post's glorification of Zeeskyy that omits any mention of Nazis?

.